The HyperTexts
Zionist Quotes Continued: Herzl, Jabotinsky, Netanyahu, Weizmann,
Sharon, Barak, Weitz, Ben-Gurion, Sharett, Dayan, Rabin, Begin
These quotations by right-wing Zionists―what they
said in their own words―leave no
doubt that their goal from the very beginning was to
"transfer" (ethnically cleanse) Palestinians and
"appropriate" (steal) their land.
While the stolen land may be "free" to Israeli robber barons, it has been very
costly to Palestinians, Americans and the world, as the Palestinian Nakba ("Catastrophe") led directly
to 9-11 and two disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is a two-part collection of quotations; to start at the beginning please
click Zionist Quotations Part I.
compiled by Michael R. Burch, an editor and publisher of
Holocaust and Nakba poetry
Herzl and Hitler: twin sons of different mothers?
How can such terrible things happen, in the first place?
Did the father of Zionism and Israel, Theodor Herzl, agree with
Adolf Hitler that
there was a "Jewish problem" simply because most Jews were not tall,
fair-skinned, fair-haired, blue-eyed Nordic demigods? Was Herzl's "solution" to the
Jewish problem exactly the same as Hitler’s original "solution"
(i.e., exporting Jews to some distant, remote hinterland where they could not
offend Aryans by being seen and heard)? If so, how should the civilized world,
which has determined racism to be an abomination, deal with Israeli
anti-Semitism against Palestinians? Has Israel erected walls twice as high as
the Berlin Wall throughout Palestine because most Jews decline to see or hear the suffering of the Semites their government and military
persecute so terribly: the Palestinian Arabs? If it was wrong for Germans to
refuse to see and hear the suffering of Jews during the Holocaust, how can Jews
justify closing their eyes and ears to the suffering of Palestinians today?
(Of course pro-Israel propagandists routinely claim that the walls are for
"security" purposes only, but this is patently untrue, an obvious lie. Security
walls are built along borders, on one's own side of the land. But Israel's
"security walls" snake deep inside the West Bank, stealing valuable land and
water resources from the Palestinians. If I build a wall halfway across my
neighbor's yard, using armed men to keep him at bay, it's obvious that I'm
trying to steal his land, so if I claim to want "peace" with him, of course he
knows I'm lying. If Israel wants true peace and real security, obviously it has to stop
stealing Palestinian land.)
Adolf Hitler, the prophet-evangelist-father of Nazism, didn’t set out to exterminate
the Jews. The first use of the term "final solution" by the Nazis may have been
in a Nazi party document published in 1931, which said: "... for the final
solution of the Jewish question it is proposed to use the Jews in Germany for
slave labor or for cultivation of the German swamps administered by a special SS
division." While that document is chilling enough, there is no mention of
deliberate genocide.
Theodor Herzl, the prophet-evangelist-father of Zionism, didn’t set out to
exterminate the Palestinians. Just as Hitler saw Jews merely as obstacles in the
way of German nationalism, so Herzl saw Arabs merely as obstacles in the way of Jewish
nationalism. It seems possible that Hitler never fully considered what his
various solutions to the "Jewish problem" would mean for millions of completely
innocent Jewish women and children. It seems possible that Herzl never
fully considered what his various solutions to the "Jewish problem" would mean
for millions of completely innocent Arab women and children. But Hitler’s
"solutions" led to the suffering and premature deaths (i.e., murders) of
multitudes of Jews, and Herzl’s "solutions" led to the suffering and premature deaths
(also murders) of multitudes of Palestinians. Hitler was the single person most responsible
for World War II. Herzl could be the single person
most responsible for World War III. And the two seem very similar in a number of
ways:
They both had loving, doting mothers who encouraged their artistic pursuits.
They were both extremely close to their mothers.
They were both intelligent but often indifferent students.
They were both daydreamers and loners who were intolerant of criticism.
The were both narcissists who suffered bouts of depression, envy, self-disgust
and self-pity.
They both read poetry and wrote poetry.
Mussolini called Hitler a sentimentalist; Herzl's biographer Amos Elon
called him an "absurd sentimentalist."
They both moved to Vienna, where they were frustrated artists (Herzl a
playwright, Hitler a painter).
They were both rejected repeatedly in their chosen fields of artistic endeavor.
Their artistic failures and non-Aryan looks drove them both to self-loathing,
perhaps to self-hatred.
Hitler came to loathe the "alien face" of the Jew: perhaps because he
despised his own?
Herzl spoke of finding a land where Jews with "hooked noses" and "bow legs"
could live apart.
They were both great admirers of German Kultur (culture) and detested
Eastern/Oriental culture.
They both considered Slavs and other non-Aryans to be inferior, "servant
peoples."
The were both obsessed with "the Jewish problem."
They both spoke and wrote extensively about the "Jewish problem."
They both came up with multiple highly implausible "solutions" to the "Jewish problem."
Hitler's "solutions" including exporting Jews to other nations, enslavement, and
genocide.
Herzl's "solutions" included fighting duels, mass conversion, intermarriage and
ethnic cleansing of Arabs.
They both were avid admirers of Wagner, an anti-Semite who called Jews "a colony
of worms."
They both wrote glowingly of Martin Luther, an anti-Semite who advocated robbing
and killing Jews.
Although being short (around 5' 8") and dark, they both admired tall, blue-eyed, fair-skinned
people.
They were both infatuated with women with "golden" hair and blue eyes.
Hitler married Eva Braun, a golden-haired, blue-eyed woman.
Herzl married Julie Naschauer, a "petite, blond, blue-eyed" woman.
They both despised the physical characteristics of Jews, Arabs and other
"Orientals" (i.e., Semites).
They both had "crazy dreams" which they made come true, against all odds.
They were both charismatics; people compared Herzl to the Hebrew prophets and
Christ.
They both acquired infatuated disciples who considered them to be "the Messiah."
They both spoke of being prophets and instruments or helpers of the Messiah.
They both believed they were meant to personally intervene in human history.
Like Hitler, Herzl was convinced that he personally would "save" his people.
Like Hitler, Herzl was fascinated by the "phenomenon of the mob" and mob
manipulation and control.
Hitler was a Nazi; Herzl was an Ashkenazi Jew.
Herzl left a detailed record of his thoughts, in the form of his own "massive
notes, diaries and letters." Readers interested in verifying my facts above
should read Herzl, by Amos Elon, because Elon's biography is based on
the written record Herzl left us himself. Few lives have been as extensively and thoroughly
documented as those of Herzl and Hitler ― yet another
parallel.
Et Tu Brute? Jewish anti-Semitism
Hitler and Herzl seemed to loathe the people who looked the most like
themselves. Is this
not symptomatic of some deep-seated disease, which needs to be cured once and
for good? Why hasn't Israel received the message the Jews waited long
centuries to hear: that there is nothing wrong with being short, dark, "different" or non-Aryan.
Hitler is dead. The Nazis were defeated. The Holocaust is over. Why has Israel
become a
bastion of racism, when Jews should prize racial equality like the proverbial
pearl of great price?
Why do so many Israelis favor Jews with Germanic origins over Jews of oriental
extraction? Isn't there something terribly wrong with a society that sees
one person as "good/clean/superior" and another person as a "bad/unclean/inferior"
based on skin tone and some strip of dirt where their ancestors originated? What
sort of nation would the United States be, if we had to know a young girl's
ethnic and geographical origins, in order to properly value her as a human
being?
The genesis and evolution of Hitler's final solution
Hitler’s "final solution" evolved over time and only became genocide when he
realized that feeding and caring for millions of Jews who could no longer feed
and care for themselves (because the Nazis had stolen their land, homes and
property) was incredibly expensive. In the cold
calculations of fascism, there is a limit to how much money superior beings are
willing to invest in keeping inferior beings alive and in good health. Now that Israel
is faced with feeding and caring for millions of despised Palestinians, will its
leaders come to the same chilling conclusion? Is genocide inevitable for the
children of Gaza, unless the world persuades Israel that Hitler and Herzl were
wrong?
Will the world stand by and allow Israel to do to the children of Gaza what Nazi
Germany did to the children of Auschwitz?
Hitler tried to "export" his "Jewish problem" to other countries for years.
It was not until 1940-1941 that he junked the last of his hare-brained schemes (to
export the Jews to Madagascar) and decided that the final "final solution" would
be genocide. This decision seems to have been reached during the time that Operation
Barbarossa, the invasion of Russia, was being planned. Russia had millions of
Jews who were spread out across a huge geographical area. It would
have been incredibly expensive and a logistical nightmare to round them up and
transport them to concentration camps, in the middle of a war between two
military titans. So the decision was made for Nazi assassins to accompany the
regular German troops and shoot Jews and other "undesirables" on sight. The
assassins would kill women and children, not just men. Once this horrendous
decision had been made, it was only "logical" for the Nazis to start killing women
and children in the European concentration camps as well, along with any men
unable to provide slave labor.
It seems inconceivable that modern human beings could be so coldly, so inhumanly
"logical." But of course white American Christians once made Native American
women and children walk the Trail of Tears, and many of them died horrible
deaths along the way. And of course white American Christians once forced black
women and children to serve as slaves, and many of them died exquisitely
horrible deaths — including those who perished in the dark, dank, festering holds
of slave ships. So if today's "people of the book" are
willing and able to consign Palestinian women and children
to this new Trail of Tears,
perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. Perhaps the ethics of Jews and Christians —
like beauty and racism — are only skin deep.
The kind of racism that allows one human being to consider another human being
completely and utterly insignificant is obviously the stuff of nightmares. It led to the Shoah ("Catastrophe") of the Jews. Has
it now led to the Nakba ("Catastrophe") of the
Palestinians? I, for one, am convinced that it has. But why take my word for it?
Let’s take a look at what the leading Jewish Zionists said themselves. Then you
can draw your own conclusions ...
Israeli Apartheid: did it "just happen" or was it planned, from the start?
The following quotes are drawn from
the published books and personal diaries
of leading Zionists, and from declassified Israeli government and military
documents. They often read like the of
Hitler and his Nazi goons, as they plotted the ethnic cleansing of the Jews in
the days before their "final solution." What do these quotes mean for the
children of Gaza and Occupied Palestine?
Theodor Herzl
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904) is the person primarily responsible for the invention
of Zionism as a political movement and international force. Born into a
prosperous Budapest family, he was secular (not religious), cosmopolitan, an
intellectual, a doctor of law, a minor play writer, and the founder of the World
Zionist Organization. Herzl observed the
"Dreyfus affair" in France with an understandable sense of dread (Alfred Dreyfus, a
Jewish officer in the French military, was wrongfully convicted of treason and
sent to Devil's Island). The wave of French anti-Semitism produced (or perhaps
exposed) by the Dreyfus trial led Herzl to write Der Judenstaat ("The
Jewish State"). The book was published in 1896 with the subtitle "An Attempt at a
Modern Solution of the Jewish Question." (Righteous Victims, p. 20)
On June 12, 1895 Herzl wrote of the Palestinians in his diary:
"We must expropriate gently the private property on the
state assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the
border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while
denying it
employment in our country. The property owners will come over to our side. Both
the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out
discretely and circumspectly. Let the owners of the immoveable property believe
that they are cheating us, selling us things for more than they are worth. But
we are not going to sell them anything back." (Complete Diaries and America And The Founding Of
Israel, p. 49 and Righteous Victims, p. 21-22)
Of course there is nothing "gentle" about taking what little penniless people
have, denying them employment, and leaving them homeless and destitute. But that is
exactly what happened to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in 1948, and
there was nothing at all "gentle" about the methods employed against them at that time,
or since.
And please note that Herzl's plan was formed nearly a half century before the
Holocaust. The Palestinians played no role in European anti-Semitism, which was
largely a Christian phenomenon. Their fate was sealed by a conspiracy between
European Jews and Christian Zionists like Lord Balfour and Winston Churchill, long
before the Nazis rose to power. The Holocaust accelerated the rate at which Jews
emigrated to Palestine, but the Zionists were not merely looking for a safe place to
land and take shelter in a storm. They came with the intent, from the beginning, of evicting
the Palestinians, which meant leaving them landless, homeless and destitute,
which in turn meant them suffering and dying in large numbers. This ethnic
cleansing of the Palestinians, with all the suffering and death it produced,
would eventually lead to 9-11 and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Why? Because the United
States would eventually replace Great Britain as Israel's "rich uncle" and benefactor, supplying
Israel with hundreds of billions of dollars in financial aid and advanced
weapons, while vetoing one UN resolution after another that could have helped the
Palestinians become a free, independent nation. The Muslim men who
opposed the Nakba did not have the military
capacity to take on Israel and the United States directly, so some of them resorted to
terrorism. But what about the large-scale, systematic terrorism that had been
practiced against completely innocent Muslim women and children for more than
fifty years? In this case the egg (Israeli and US terrorism against
Palestinians) clearly preceded the chicken (Muslim terrorism against the US).
In 1897 Herzl outlined a major goal of Zionism during
the first Zionist Congress convention held in Bessel, Switzerland:
"We have an important task before us. We have met here
to lay the foundation-stone of the house that will someday shelter the Jewish
people ... We have to aim at securing legal, international guarantees for our
work." (Israel: A History, p. 14)
But what was required was only the guise of legality
because there is nothing "legal" about stealing someone else's land and freedom,
while denying them basic human rights and dignity.
On September 3rd, 1897 he wrote:
"Were I to sum up the Basle Congress in a word—which I
shall GUARD AGAINST PRONOUNCING PUBLICLY—it would be this: At Basle I founded
the Jewish State. If I said this out loud today, I would be answered by
universal laughter. Perhaps in five years, and certainly in fifty, everyone will
know it." (Israel: A History, p. 15)
This policy of saying one thing publicly and another thing privately would
become a hallmark of Zionist leaders like David Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir. They
would spoon-feed tidbits of information palatable to the American public, using
words like "democracy" and "equal rights," while always intending to create a
racist state with as many Jews and as few Palestinians as possible, regardless
of the suffering and deaths inflicted on the Arab majority. In other words,
their basic tactics were identical to Hitler's, since Hitler demanded "living
room" for "superior" Aryans and was willing to take it by hook and crook (force
and robbery) at the expense of "inferior" races.
At the same time Herzl was keeping his true intentions close to the vest,
he was also advocating the use of "tremendous propaganda"
to woo the Jewish masses into providing the warm bodies a Jewish state would
require. Twice in his book The Jewish State, Herzl spoke of using
propaganda to further the Zionist cause.
Benny Morris (a Jewish historian), describes Herzl's
"game plan":
"Herzl regarded Zionism's triumph as inevitable, not
only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because
it was in Europe's interests to rid [itself of] Jews and [relieve itself] of anti-Semitism:
the
European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote
Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-Semitism would be harnessed to his
own—Zionist—purposes." (Righteous Victims, p. 21)
Herzl clearly saw the Zionist enterprise as being
colonial. On July 7, 1902, he told the Royal Commission on Alien Immigration in
London:
I am not speaking of artificially made colonies, but
self-helping colonies, which have that great national idea." (Israel: A History,
p. 21)
Thus, while the United States was firmly opposing European colonialism, and
while Britain and France were in the process of granting their colonies
abroad independence, European Jews were in the process of creating the world's
last (or at least hopefully its last) colony. And what is colonization, but
foreigners exerting their will by force on weaker natives, resulting in massive suffering
and premature deaths (i.e., murders) among the indigenous majority?
The Jewish state in Palestine, Theodor Herzl wrote, would be Europe's bulwark
against the "inferior" races, among them the detested Palestinian
Arabs:
"We can be the vanguard of culture against
barbarianism." (One Palestine Complete, p. 150)
What he failed to admit to the unsuspecting general public was the tremendous degree of barbarianism that
would be required for Jews to dispossess Palestinians and drive them from their
land, farms and homes. His "vanguard of culture" would become like Hitler's
vanguard of superior culture annexing Eastern Europe and Russia.
Like Hitler, Herzl was a fanatic inspired by the racist
and nationalistic fervors of his time. Before he arrived at the idea of ethnically
cleansing Palestinians in order to create a Jewish state in Palestine, he had
proposed such bizarre schemes as:
(1) Personally presenting all Jews to the Pope, for a mass conversion.
(2) Intermarrying all Jews with non-Jews.
(3) Ridding the world of the Jewish race through mass conversion and
intermarriage.
(3) Having Jews fight duels with non-Jews in order to raise their "social
position" and "prestige."
(4) Fighting duels with well-known anti-Semites himself.
While the Zionist movement he founded would hail him as a prophet, Herzl was
indifferent to God and religion and failed to have his son
Hans circumcised (although ironically Herzl's disciples would persuade Hans to have
himself circumcised as an adult). Herzl was infatuated with girls and women who
were "blond, blue-eyed, fairy-tale creatures." His idea of masculinity, as with
Hitler, was the antithesis of himself: a "blond, mustached, dapper ...
lady-killer." Like Hitler, he fixated on the ugly and grotesque, saying, "Seeing makes
me unhappy. For whenever I see, I see something ugly or vulgar." Like Hitler, he
was prey to self-loathing, self-disgust, self-hatred and self-pity. His fear of women was
"real and deep."
Herzl was a severe critic of European anti-Semitism who wrote "There is no good
deed that excuses a bad one." He was appalled by "the recklessness of pseudointellectuals who enthused over anarchist crimes with "Never mind the
victims if it is a beautiful gesture." And yet he would calmly propose the
ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, being sure not to let the general public know
the suffering his plans were sure to produce. In the end, he and Hitler had the same purpose, the
same tactics and the same methods: ethnic cleansing, racist propaganda, mob
control, etc. Thus, the foundations of Nazi Germany and the modern state of
Israel are eerily similar.
Ze'ev Jabotinsky
Ze'ev Jabotinsky (1880-1940) was born in Tsarist Russia to a liberal Jewish
family.
He worked as a journalist in Rome and Vienna and soon became a polemicist for
the Zionist cause. He was also one of the founders of the Haganah (the
paramilitary wing of Zionism). Jabotinsky protested the exclusion of Transjordan
(modern-day Jordan) from British Mandate Palestine, establishing the Revisionist
Party in 1925 (so called because it sought to "revise" the terms of the
Mandate). The right-wing Revisionist Movement eventually evolved into the Herut
and Likud parties. Jabotinsky also created the youth movement Betar, which like the
Hitler Youth was
"characterized by militaristic, some might say fascist, appearance (dark brown
uniforms), activities (parade ground drills) with firearm exercises, slogans,
and a militaristic ideology and structure." Jabotinsky admired Mussolini and
"repeatedly sought affiliation with and assistance from Rome."
In 1923, Jabotinsky said that the "sole way" for Jews to deal with Palestinians
was through "total avoidance of all attempts to arrive at a settlement." (The
Village Voice, "Death Wish in the Holy Land," Dec. 12, 2001)
This doctrine of avoiding peace at all costs has remained in effect ever since,
as the government of Israel merely pretends to be interested in "peace" while
continuing to "redeem" the land by "cleansing" it of Palestinians.
Jabotinsky
advocated using force to crush Palestinian nationalism, creating the doctrine of
the IRON WALL in an article run by Ha'aretz Daily in 1923:
"... Settlement can thus develop under the protection of
a force that is not dependent on the local population, behind an IRON WALL which
they will be powerless to break down ... a voluntary agreement is just not
possible. As long as the Arabs preserve a gleam of hope that they will succeed
in getting rid of us, nothing in the world can cause them to relinquish this
hope, precisely because they are not a rubble but a living people. And a living
people will be ready to yield on such fateful issues only when they give up all
hope of getting rid of the Alien Settlers. Only then will extremist groups with
their slogan 'No, never' lose their influence, and only then their influence be
transferred to more moderate groups. And only then will the moderates offer
suggestions for compromise. Then only will they begin bargaining with us on
practical matters, such as guarantees against PUSHING THEM OUT, and equality of
civil, and national rights."
Unlike other Zionist leaders, Jabotinsky spoke his mind
publicly. He "criticized the ideologues in the Zionist leadership (such as
Ben-Gurion and Moshe Sharett) who thought that Palestinians could be bribed into
selling their country and rights." Jabotinsky believed Jewish rights overrode
Palestinian rights and he warned that violence was inevitable, saying in 1923:
"The Arabs loved their country as much as the Jews did.
Instinctively, they understood Zionist aspirations very well, and their decision
to resist them was only natural ... There was no misunderstanding between Jew
and Arab, but a natural conflict ... No Agreement was possible with the
Palestinian Arab; they would accept Zionism only when they found themselves up
against an IRON WALL, when they realized they had no alternative but to accept
Jewish settlement." (America And The Founding Of Israel, p. 90)
Jabotinsky was branded a racist by many other Zionists in the 1920s. However,
Ben-Gurion and other Zionist leaders later came to adopt his IRON WALL doctrine,
and implement it.
Jabotinsky understood the Palestinian people's
attachment to their country, saying in 1923:
"They look upon Palestine with the same instinctive love
and true favor the Aztecs looked upon Mexico or any Sioux looked upon his
prairie. Palestine will remain for the Palestinians not a borderland, but their
birthplace, the center and basis of their own national existence." (Righteous
Victims, p. 36)
Jabotinsky advocated ruthless colonization of
Palestine, saying in 1925:
"Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must
either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of the native
population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop
under the protection of a force independent of the local population—an IRON WALL which the native population cannot break through. This is, in
to, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate it any other way would be
hypocrisy." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 28)
And he also stated that other Zionists believed in the need for an
"Iron Wall":
"In this sense, there is no meaningful difference
between our militarists and our vegetarians. One prefers an IRON WALL of Jewish
bayonets, the other proposes an IRON WALL of British bayonets, the third
proposes an agreement with Baghdad, and appears to be satisfied with Baghdad's
bayonets—a strange and somewhat risky taste—but we all applaud, day and night,
the IRON WALL." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 28)
Of course there were exceptions, such as the great Jewish scientist, intellectual and
humanist Albert Einstein, who constantly called for Jews to treat Arabs
humanely. But his voice was drowned out in the mass chorus of anti-Semitism
against Arabs, which was excused by the anti-Semitism of Nazi Germany, as if one
evil deed somehow excused the other.
Jabotinsky called Zionism a "colonizing adventure" that
required force, like Britain colonizing India:
"If you wish to colonize a land in which people are
already living, you must provide a garrison for the land, or find a benefactor
who will maintain the garrison on your behalf ... Zionism is a colonizing
adventure and, therefore, it stands or falls on the question of armed forces."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 45)
Unfortunately, such "colonizing adventures" are extremely hard on the
women and children being displaced and left homeless.
Jabotinsky constantly advocated the use of force, saying
in 1926:
"The tragedy lies in the fact that there is a collision
here between two truths ... But our justice is greater. The Arab is culturally
backward, but his instinctive patriotism is just as pure and noble as our own;
it cannot be bought, it can only be curbed [by] force majeure
[major force]." (Righteous
Victims, p. 108)
How could Jewish justice be "greater" if Jews were dispossessing innocent women
and children? Like Hitler and other racists,
Jabotinsky based his cold, hard calculations on the racial and cultural
superiority of the invaders. He declared that Zionism had no justice, no law,
and no God, other than Jewish colonization of the land:
"There is no justice, no law, and no God in heaven, only
a single law which decides and supersedes all—[Jewish] settlement [of the
land]." (Righteous Victims, p. 108)
According to Jabotinsky, European Jews have little in
common with the "Orient," by which he meant the Middle East:
"We Jews have nothing in common with what is called the
'Orient,' thank God. To the extent that our uneducated masses have ancient
spiritual traditions and laws that call the Orient, they must be weaned away
from them, and this is in fact what we are doing in every decent school, what
life itself is doing with great success. We are going in Palestine, first for
our national convenience, [second] to sweep out thoroughly all traces of the
'Oriental soul.' As for the Arabs in Palestine, what they do is
their business; but if we can do them a favor, it is to help them liberate
themselves from the Orient.'" (One Palestine Complete, p. 151)
So much for the Jews "returning" to their ancient homeland, their religion and
their God! Like many other Zionists, Jabotinsky disdained the "Oriental soul" and
saw
Zionism as a way to "cleanse" the land of inferior beings. Today this rabid Jewish racism is
not only directed at Arabs, but also at Jews of Arab extraction, by Jews of
European extraction. Israel is dealing with layers of racism: Jew
against Arab, European Jew against Oriental Jew, Oriental Jew against African
Jew, etc.
Like many Zionists, Jabotinsky was not satisfied with
stealing just Palestine from the Arabs, saying in 1934:
"I devote my life to the rebirth of the Jewish State,
with a Jewish majority, on both sides of the Jordan." (Israel: A History, p. 76)
Unlike Jewish humanists like Albert Einstein, Jabotinsky
refused to accept equality with Arabs:
"For a long time, many Jews, including Zionists, were
unwilling to understand the simple truth. They maintained that the creation of
important positions in Palestine (settlements, cities, schools, etc.) is enough.
According to them a national life could be freely developed even though the
majority of the population were to be Arab. This is a great mistake. History
proves that any national position, however strong and important cannot be
safeguarded as long as the nation which built it does not constitute a majority.
A minority can safeguard its cultural position only as long as it can
control
the local majority. Sooner or later, every country in the world is to become the
national state of the predominant nation there. Thus if we desire that Eretz
Yisrael should become and remain a Jewish State, we must first of all create a
Jewish majority." (The Ideology of Betar)
The ideology above was being taught to the children of Betar, as their "marching
orders."
Jabotinsky also advocated forced expulsion of Arabs, saying
in a letter dated November 1939:
"There is no choice: the Arabs must make room for the
Jews of Eretz Israel. If it was possible to transfer the Baltic peoples, it is
also possible to move the Palestinian Arabs." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p.
29)
He was obviously a racist intent on ethnic cleansing:
"We Jews, thank God, have nothing to do with the East
... The Islamic soul must be broomed [swept] out of Eretz-Yisrael ... [Muslims
are] yelling rabble dressed up in gaudy, savage rags." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 29)
His use of the term "broomed" makes it sound as if he's talking about sweeping away dung, or flies. Unfortunately, this kind of
virulent racism can be found in the words and deeds of many of the leaders of
Israel throughout the years, as you will see if you continue reading. It's as if
the United States was being run by the Grand Wizards of the KKK.
Just before Jabotinsky's death in 1940, he verified what
many people have come to believe, that the Zionists were copying the tactics of
the Nazis:
"The world has become accustomed to the idea of mass
migrations ... Hitler—as odious as he is to us—has given this idea a good
name in the world." (One Palestine Complete, p. 407)
Adolf Hitler "transferred" Jews from their homes,
leaving them homeless and destitute, and Jews rightly called the result a
Holocaust. The crime of forcible expulsion ("transfer") was among the charges
brought against Adolf Eichmann, one the architects of the Nazi Holocaust, by the
state of Israel. Israel executed Eichmann for his crimes. But if evicting a Jewish families from their homes and
causing their premature deaths constitutes murder, war crimes and a Holocaust,
what should we say and do when Israeli Jews do the same things to Palestinians?
Since Palestinians are Semites, isn't Zionism guilty of the same crimes as
Nazism: anti-Semitism, ethnic cleansing, mass murder and attempted genocide? Why
not hold Israel to the same standard as all civilized nations and insist that
Israel establish equal rights, fair laws and fair courts for everyone,
or let the Palestinians have their freedom as an independent nation?
Here, he explains why Israel has the "right" to expand its borders to the east
of the Jordan River:
"Palestine is a territory whose chief geographical feature is this: that the
river Jordan does not delineate its frontier but flows through its centre."—Vladimir Jabotinsky, at the 16th Zionist Congress, 1929, quoted by Desmond
Stewart in The Middle East: Temple of Janus, p.304.
Benyamin Netanyahu
Benyamin Netanyahu is the current Prime Minister of Israel.
On June 17, 1996 Netanyahu’s office released a statement outlining his
government’s guidelines with regard to the peace processes. It said no to
withdrawal from the Occupied Palestinian Territories, no to a Palestinian State,
no to an official Palestinian presence in Jerusalem, and no to the refugees’
right of return “to any part of the Land of Israel west of the Jordan River”. (Elia
Zureik, The Palestinian Refugees: Background, Institute for Palestine
Studies, Washington, 1996. p. 127)
"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China,
when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among
the Arabs of the territories." (Benyamin Netanyahu, then the Israeli Deputy Foreign
Minister, speaking to students at Bar Ilan
University, as published in the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24,
1989)
But of course "mass expulsions" would include completely innocent Palestinian
women and children. Et tu, Brute?
Chaim Weizmann
Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952) was a Russia-born Jew. In 1904 he emigrated to
England. During WWI, he developed a method of producing acetone, which was
required for the production of artillery shells. This earned him favor with the
British government. In 1917 he helped secure the promise of the British
government to
create a "Jewish National Home" in Palestine (the Balfour Declaration). Along
with Theodor Herzl and David Ben-Gurion, Chaim Weizmann was one of the "big
three" responsible for making political Zionism a reality. Weizmann was a charismatic,
persuasive speaker who became the first president of Israel.
But Weizmann sometimes sounded like Hitler:
"We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you
like it or
not ...You can hasten our arrival or you can equally
retard it. It is however
better for you to help us so as to avoid our
constructive powers being
turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the
world." (Chaim
Weizmann, "Judische Rundschau," No. 4,
1920)
In 1914, Weizmann lied, saying Palestine was "a country without people" when in
fact hundreds of thousands of Palestinians lived there:
"In its initial stage, Zionism was conceived by its
pioneers as a movement wholly depending on mechanical factors: there is a
country which happens to be called Palestine, a country without people, and, on
the other hand, there exists the Jewish people, and it has no country. What else
is necessary, then, than to fit the gem into the ring, to unite this people with
this country? The owners of the country [the Ottoman Turks] must, therefore, be
persuaded and conceived that this marriage is advantageous, not only for the
[Jewish] people and for the country, but also for themselves." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 6)
Other Zionists like Golda Meir would also claim that the Palestinians
didn’t really exist, were not a people, did not constitute a nation, etc. They
sound just like the Nazis who denied the humanity of Jews.
Weizmann described the Palestinian people as inhuman steppingstones:
"the rocks of Judea ... obstacles that had to be cleared
on a difficult path." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 17)
Zionists often use such dehumanizing language, referring
to Palestinians as: dirty, unclean, primitive, uncultured, naive, ignorant, savage, a "demographic problem,"
and as "ticking time bombs" (because they might have babies and outnumber
Jews), etc.
Weizmann visited Jerusalem in late 1918, and described
the ultra-orthodox Jewish neighborhoods to his wife:
"There's nothing more humiliating than 'our' Jerusalem.
Anything that could be done to desecrate and defile the sacred has been done. It
is impossible to imagine so much falsehood, blasphemy, greed, so many lies. It's
such an accursed city, there's nothing there, no creature comforts ... [It]
hasn't a single clean and comfortable apartment." (One Palestine Complete, p.
71)
So it seems Jewish "superiority" was just a racial myth, as racial superiority
invariably is.
Also in 1918 Weizmann condescendingly criticized Arabs for believing in
what actually ended up happening to them:
"The poor ignorant fellah [Arabic for peasant] does not
worry about politics, but when he is told repeatedly by people in whom he has
confidence that his livelihood is in danger of being taken away from him by us,
he becomes our mortal enemy... The Arab is primitive and believes what he is
told." (One Palestine Complete, p. 109)
The Zionists seemed to be blind to their own racism. They admitted that the Jews
were
far from "superior," then looked down their snooty noses at Arabs who were smart enough to
figure out what they were actually up to.
In 1919 at the peace conference at Versailles, Weizmann
proved Arabs were correct in their assumptions, saying:
"the country [Palestine] should be Jewish in the same
way that France is French and Britain is British." (One Palestine Complete, p.
117)
Weizmann repeated the same idea to the English Zionist
Federation on September 19, 1919:
"By a Jewish National Home I mean the creation of such
conditions that as the country is developed we can pour in a considerable number
of immigrants, and finally establish such a society in Palestine that Palestine
shall be as Jewish as England is English or America American." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 41)
But in the early 1900s, Zionism was not popular with most Jews; it was the
dream of small numbers of zealots who often emulated the philosophy,
stratagems and methods of Hitler:
"The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was built on air ...
every day and every hour of these last ten years, when opening the newspapers, I
thought: Whence will the next blow come? I trembled lest the British Government
would call me and ask: 'Tell us, what is this Zionist Organization? Where are
they, your Zionists?' ... The Jews, they knew, were against us [the Zionists];
we stood alone on a little island, a tiny group of Jews with a foreign past."
(UN: The Origins And Evolution Of The Palestine Problem, section V)
The Holocaust changed things, and understandably so. But it
was the Zionists who insisted that Jews not only resettle in Palestine, but
drive out the Palestinians and seize control of the region. On May 25, 1942,
Weizmann said:
"Palestine alone could absorb and provide for the
homeless and the stateless Jews uprooted by the war. It [has galvanized] all the
sympathy of the world for the martyrdom of the Jews ... the Zionists reject all
schemes to resettle these victims elsewhere—in Germany, or Poland, or in
sparsely populated regions such as Madagascar." [It was Hitler who had first
suggested Madagascar as a place where the Jews of Europe might be sent,
before writing off the idea as infeasible and coming up with his horrendous
"final solution."] (Israel: A History, p. 113)
So, in effect, the Zionists used the Holocaust to
provide the "warm bodies" needed for a Jewish state. To be fair, it was going to
be very difficult for most of the Jewish refugees, no matter where they went.
And there were millions of non-Jewish displaced persons as well. Their suffering
is often forgotten, but shouldn't be. The problem was not that the world was
insensitive to the plight of Jews and other displaced persons. The problem was
that the world was recovering from a world war that had left perhaps 70 million
people dead, millions more displaced, and much of Europe and Russia a mass of
smoking ruins. But the Zionists put their racist agenda on a pedestal, and thus created
tremendous suffering for Jews and Arabs alike. Nothing mandated Jewish refugees
seizing control of the regions that granted them safe harbor. Only Palestine
suffered that fate. Everywhere else they went the Jews became democrats who asked
for equal rights, and increasingly received them. But they were unwilling to
settle for democracy in Palestine; thus to the rest of the world they seem
hypocritical. If they want equal rights for themselves, how can they deny equal
rights to other people? Is that fair?
Weizmann tried to extend Zionist colonization beyond British Mandated Palestine.
In 1934 he tried to interest the French Mandate authorities in a Jewish
settlement plan for Syria and Lebanon. Similar ideas were also proposed by
Ben-Gurion and Moshe Dayan. (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 47)
Weizmann informed the Peel Commission of his expansionist
vision in 1937:
"We shall spread in the whole country in the course of
time ... this is only an arrangement for the next 25 to 30 years." (Expulsion
Of The Palestinians, p. 62)
Weizmann fantasized about Palestinians leaving
voluntarily, writing in a letter dated April 28, 1939 to the American Zionist
Solomon Goldman:
"The realization of this project [a land purchase] would
mean the emigration of 10,000 [Palestinian] Arabs [to Jabal al-Druze in Syria],
the acquisition of 300,000 dunums ... It would also create a significant
precedent if 10,000 Arabs were to emigrate peacefully of their own
volition, which no doubt would be followed by others." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 167)
On July 8, 1947, Weizmann described how stateless Jews
felt, to UNSCOP (the UN Special Committee On Palestine):
"We ask today: 'What are the Poles? What are the French?
What are the Swiss?' When that is asked, everyone points to a country, to
certain institution, to parliamentary institution, and the man in the street
will know exactly what it is. He has a passport. If you ask what is a Jew is—well,
he is a man who has to offer a long explanation for his existence, and any
person who has to offer an explanation as to what he is, is always suspect—and from suspicion there is only one step to hatred or contempt." (Israel: A
History, p. 147)
But of course this is how stateless, dispossessed Palestinians feel today.
Why should we elevate the needs, desires and feelings of Jews above those of
Palestinians?
By war's end in 1949, Chaim Weizmann was ecstatic to see the long-anticipated
ethnic cleansing of Palestinians a reality:
"a miraculous clearing of the land: the miraculous simplification of Israel's
task." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 175)
What sort of man speaks of the ethnic cleansing and
murders of human beings—including women and children—as the
"simplification" of a task? What does that sound like, but the cold hard "math"
of Hitler & Company? How can ethnic cleansing and attempted genocide be
called "miraculous"?
Ariel Sharon
Ariel Sharon [1928-] is currently a vegetable, which may be an improvement,
considering his actions when his brain was functional. He is a former Israeli
general, Foreign Minister, and Prime Minister.
According to the pre-vegetative-state wisdom of Ariel Sharon, Israel is above
the law, or is a law unto itself:
"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but
certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel
on trial." (Quoted by BBC News Online)
Addressing a
meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Sharon said:
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and
courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first
of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization, or Jewish State without
the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." (Agence
France Presse, November 15, 1998)
At the same time he said:
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many
(Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because
everything we take now will stay ours ... Everything we don't grab will go to
them." (Agence France Presse, Nov. 15, 1998)
Ehud Barak
Ehud Barak [1942-] has served Israel as Defense Minister, Deputy Prime Minister
and Prime Minister.
Ehud Barak, on Israeli TV (date undetermined, but
confirmed by former Israeli Knesset Member Marsha Friedman) said:
"If I were a Palestinian, I would be a terrorist."
(Speaking about Ariel Sharon's policies toward the
Palestinians.)
"I would have joined a terrorist organization." Ehud Barak's response to Gideon Levy, a columnist for
Ha'aretz newspaper, when Barak was asked what he would have done if he had
been born a Palestinian.
Yosef Weitz
Yosef (Joseph) Weitz (1890-1970) was a Polish Jew who settled in
Palestine in 1908. Weitz was a director of
the Jewish National Fund who espoused "transferring" Palestinians from their homes, farms, and businesses. His diary (contained in five volumes
located in the Zionist Archives in Jerusalem) contains injunctions not to "miss the
opportunities" offered by the 1948 war to ethnically cleanse the land that came
under Jewish control. His diary also contains evidence of atrocities
perpetrated against Palestinians by the fledgling Jewish state.
The transfer policies of the Zionists were clearly formulated long before the
war of 1948. While some pro-Israel apologists deny that there was a Transfer
Committee, there is no doubt that the polices attributed to the Transfer
Committee were actually enacted: ethnic cleansing of hundreds of Palestinian
villages, the complete destruction of many of the smaller villages, the
reduction of the Arab percentage of the population in towns that were not
completely destroyed, the eviction of Muslim Palestinians when Christian
Palestinians were not evicted, etc. According to Weitz himself, the general plan
had been formulated "as early as 1940," with a specific limitation of the
non-Jewish percentage of the population in mind:
"There are some who believe that the non-Jewish
population, even in a
high percentage, within our borders will be more
effectively under our
surveillance; and there are some who believe the
contrary, i.e., that it is
easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of
a neighbor than over
those of a tenant. [I] tend to support the latter view
and have an
additional argument: ... the need to sustain the character
of the state which
will henceforth be Jewish ... with a non-Jewish minority
limited to 15
percent. I had already reached this fundamental position
as early as 1940
[and] it is entered in my diary." (From Israel: an Apartheid State by
Uri Davis, p. 5)
So why quibble, when the historical facts agree with the master plan of the
architects? Weitz formulated a plan which is still being implemented by Israeli
settlers (colonists) to this day: seizing the high ground:
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to
enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours ...
Everything we don't grab will go to them." (From Israel: an Apartheid State
by Uri Davis, p. 5)
According to Benny Morris:
"Through 1948 he had ready access to cabinet ministers
... and often, he [Weitz] met with Ben-Gurion ... Weitz's
connections also encompassed the Yishuv's military brass, especially on the
level of district, area and battalion commanders, [in short] Weitz was
well-placed to shape and influence decision-making regarding the Arab population
on the national level and to oversee the implementation of policy on the local
level." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 182)
Yosef Weitz stated the two main goals of "transfer" on November 15,
1937:
"...the transfer of the Arab population from
the area of the Jewish state does not serve only one aim—to diminish the Arab
population. It also serves a second, no less important, aim which is to [take]
land presently held and cultivated by the Arabs and ...
release it for Jewish inhabitants." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 94-95)
Land taken from Palestinians individuals would be given to
Jewish individuals. This is exactly what Nazi Germany did when it stole Jewish
land, homes and property and gave it to Germans.
Weitz was obsessed with "transferring" the Palestinian
people to neighboring Arab countries. He
wrote in his diary on December 20, 1940:
"... it must be clear that there is no room in the country
for both [Arab and Jewish] peoples ... If the Arabs leave it,
the country will become wide and spacious for us ... The only solution is a Land of Israel, at least a western land of Israel [i.e.,
Palestine, since Transjordan is the eastern portion], without
Arabs. There is no room here for compromises ... There is no way but to
transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to
transfer all of them, save perhaps for [the Palestinian Arabs of] Bethlehem,
Nazareth, and the old Jerusalem. Not one village must be left, not one [Bedouin]
tribe. The transfer must be directed at Iraq, Syria, and even Transjordan
[eastern portion of Eretz Yisrael]. For this goal funds will be found ... And
only after this transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our
brothers and the Jewish problem will cease to exist. There is no other
solution." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 131-132)
On March 18,
1941 Weitz recorded in his diary while visiting Jewish colonies in the
Jordan Valley:
"Once again I come face to face with the land settlement
difficulties that emanate from the existence of two people in close proximity
... We have clashing interests with the Arabs everywhere, and
these interests will go and clash increasingly... and once again the answer
from inside me is heard: only [Palestinian Arab] population transfer and
evacuating this country so it would become exclusively for us [Jews] is the
solution. This idea does not leave me in these days and I find comfort in it in
the face of enormous difficulties in the way of land-buying and settlement."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 132)
On a visit to Mishmar
Ha'emek a few day later, Weitz wrote:
"I am increasingly consumed by despair. The Zionist idea
is the answer to the Jewish question in the Land of Israel; only in the land of
Israel, but not that the [Palestinian] Arabs should remain a majority.
The
complete evacuation of the country from its other inhabitants and handing it
over to the Jewish people is the answer." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 132)
When a "Jewish majority" in Palestine was not attainable via Jewish immigration
and natural population growth, Zionists advocated the use of force to ethnically
cleanse and to dispossess the Palestinian people. On June 26, 1941, Weitz wrote in his diary:
"Throughout the journey my reflections were focused on
that plan, about which I have been thinking for years: the plan ... of
evacuating the country for us [Jews]. I know that difficulties ... but only
through population transfer will redemption come ... There is no room for us
with our neighbours ... development is a very slow process ... They [the
Palestinian Arabs] are too many and too much rooted [in the country] ... the
only way is to cut and eradicate them from the roots. I feel that this is the
truth... I am beginning to understand the essence of the miracle which
should happen with the arrival of the Messiah; [a] miracle
does not happen in
evolution, but all of a sudden, in one moment... I can see the enormous
difficulties but this should not deflect us from our aim; on the contrary,
we
must double our efforts to overcome the difficulties and find a listening ear,
first in America, then in Britain and then in the neighboring countries. There
the money will make it. People and money will be transferred there. We will set
up an apparatus from the Yishuv manned by distinguished experts and these will
supervise the Arab transfer and resettlement and a second
apparatus will receive the [Jewish] redeemers and plant them in the land ...
I pondered these measures all the way from Tel Aviv and also while visiting near
Ramat Hasharon and K'afr Azar. This is the aim, the redemption, and the dream."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 134)
This racist idea of Jews "cleansing" and "redeeming" the land can clearly be
seen flourishing in Israel even today, as Jews bulldoze Palestinian houses and
trees to the ground in acts of government-sanctioned robbery. Most robbers at
least have the sense to steal things of value. But many Zionists believe
that only Jewish hands and Jewish labor have any value, so they insist on
eradicating anything created or planted by Palestinians: even valuable houses
and olive
trees.
In similar passion, Weitz also spoke about expanding the
"Jewish state's" borders to include areas in Lebanon and Syria. While meeting
Menachem Ussishkin on June 22, 1941, he wrote:
"The land of Israel is not small at all, if only the
Arabs will be removed, and if its frontiers would be enlarged a little; to the
north all the way to Litani [River in Lebanon], and to the east including the
Golan Heights ... while the [Palestinian] Arabs [are] transferred to northern
Syria and Iraq ... From now on we must work out a secret plan based on the
removal of the [Palestinian] Arabs from here ... [and] ... to include it
into American political circles ... today we have no other alternative
...
We will not live here with Arabs." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 134-135)
So Americans were to become unwitting accomplices in the secret plan
to ethnically cleanse the land of Palestinians, while constantly increasing the borders of
the Jewish state. This secret plan would eventually backfire on Americans in the
form of 9-11, although the secrecy was so successful most Americans still
haven't managed to put two plus two together.
Just as anti-Semitic Nazis refused to live with Jews, so anti-Semitic Jews refused to live
with Arabs.
In the summer of 1941, Yosef Weitz wrote:
"Large [Palestinian Arab] villages crowded in population
and surrounded by cultivated land growing olives, grapes, figs, sesame, and
maize fields ... Would we be able to maintain scattered settlements among
these existing villages that will always be larger than ours?
And is there any possibility of buying their [land]?... and once again I
hear that voice inside me called: evacuate [ethnically cleanse] this country." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, 133)
Like other Zionists, Weitz envisioned a
"Jewish state" on parts of "Eretz Yisrael" as a jumping ground for a "complete
redemption." He wrote this in his diary one day after the vote on the UN partition
plan in November 1947:
"The creation of the Hebrew State in part of the country
is the beginning of complete redemption ... How should we solve
the question of the [Palestinian] Arabs who constitute half of the state
population? ... I have been working day and night in these days on the
calculation of the land in the Hebrew state ... Indeed we still need to
redeem
much until most of the cultivated land will be our property." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 182)
In other words, ridding the land of Palestinians would be an act of "redemption"
according to the endlessly strange religion of racism.
But as late as 1947, after almost half a century of relentless effort, the collective ownership of the Jewish National Fund
(which constituted one-half of all Jewish land ownership) amounted
to a mere 3.5% of Palestine. Weitz knew the only solution was to steal the rest
of the land, by force (i.e., armed robbery):
"without taking action to transfer [the Palestinian
Arab] population, we will not be able to solve our question by [land] buying."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 133)
Weitz knew the obvious truth:
"[most of the land is] not Jewish-owned or even in the
category of the state domain whose ownership could be automatically assumed by a
successor government. Thus, of 13,500,000 dunums (6,000,000 of which were desert
and 7,500,000 dunums of cultivable land) in the Jewish state according to the
Partition plan, ONLY 1,500,000 dunums were Jewish owned." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 183)
But the war of 1948 provided the perfect excuse for Jews to take the land
without paying for it.
On January 13, 1948 Weitz talked to his Haifa Jewish
National Fund colleagues about taking measures to evacuate the lands of Wadi
Qabbani:
"I gave instructions not to miss the opportunities in
the turbulent hour." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 184)
Weitz wrote in his diary in January 1948 about the
inhabitants of Daliyat al-Rawha' south of Haifa:
"Isn't now the time to be rid of them? Why continue to
keep in our midst these thorns at a time when they pose a danger to us? Our
people are weighing up a solution." (Benny Morris, p. 55)
The people "weighing up the solution" came to be known as the Transfer
Committee. Weitz wrote in his diary on the 20th of February
1948 about the Bedouins crossing Baysan valley to Transjordan:
"It is possible that now is the time to implement our
original plan: transfer them there." (Benny Morris)
Weitz wrote in his diary about the inhabitants of Qumya and al-Tira in the Baysan valley:
"They must be forced to leave
their villages until peace comes." (Benny Morris, p. 56)
But a peace never came that allowed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to
return to their homes, because the Zionists destroyed hundreds of
villages and forever barred their return, or at least to this day.
In April, Weitz started to lobby the Israeli Cabinet in
favor of his obsession ("transfer"). He met Ben-Gurion in Tel Aviv on April 4
1948, and asked for an audience to discuss:
"[the] question of evacuating/clearing out the
Arabs ... [ten days later] [we] must direct our war towards the removal of as
many Arabs as possible from boundaries of out state. The guarding of their
property after their removal is a secondary question ... Finally
it was agreed that I would submit a proposal for [Palestinian Arab] removal from
localities based on my considerations." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 186)
On April 18, 1948 he started to build a list of
the villages to be ethnically cleansed first. He wrote:
"I made a summery of a list of the Arab
villages which in my opinion must be cleared out in order to complete Jewish
regions. I also made a summery of the places that have land disputes and must be
settled by military means." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 186)
What civilized nation allows its military to decide civilian land disputes?
Weitz explained why so many Palestinians were fleeing. According
to him all what that it took was "several shells ... [to] whistle over them", and
that was enough. On April 21, 1948 he wrote in his diary:
"Our army is steadily conquering Arab
villages and their inhabitants afraid and fleeing like mice. You have no idea
what happened in the Arab villages. It is enough that during the
night several shells will whistle over them and they flee for their lives.
Villages are steadily emptying, and if we continue on this course—and we shall
certainly do so as our strength increases—then villages will
empty of their
inhabitants." (Israel: A History, p. 174)
Weitz also described how fear was used by Haganah
commanders to "encourage" Palestinians to flee. On April 24, 1948 Weitz
wrote in his diary regarding the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian
villages in the Haifa area:
"I was happy to hear from him [a Haganah officer] that
this line was being adopted by the commander ... to frighten the
Arabs so long as flight-induced fear was upon them." (Israel: A History, p. 173)
Many Americans still
believe that the Palestinians
willfully abandoned their homes, farms, and business. But ethnic cleansing of
the Palestinians and the destruction of hundreds of villages obviously did not happen by
"accident."
On April 28, 1948 Weitz wrote:
"Khayriyah and Saqiyah [two Palestinian Arab villages in
the coastal plain] have also been cleared out ["also" meaning that other
villages had previously been cleared out]. My plan is getting implemented."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 186)
In the following quote, note how Weitz was pressuring
other Israelis to encourage Palestinian flight. On May 4, 1948 he wrote in his
diary regarding Beisan valley:
"The Beit Shean [Beisan] Valley is the gate for our state in the Galilee .... I told them [Beisan Valley Jewish
representatives] that clearing [of Palestinian Arabs] is the need of the
hour." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 187)
In August 1948, Yosef Weitz stated his opposition to any future Palestinian
return to their home, farms, and business:
"[Palestinian] villages should be destroyed so
that they do not attract their refugees to return. What can be
bought [from Palestinians] should be bought ... [But] first we must set
policy: Arabs who abandoned [their homes, farms, and businesses]
should not [be allowed to] return." (Benny Morris, p. 148-9)
But most Palestinians were never compensated for the land, homes, farms,
businesses and property they lost, even though Jews claimed billons of dollars
in reparations from Germany after the Holocaust. How is that fair?
In late November 1948, Weitz recorded that two of his
officials at the Jewish National Fund complained that "the army continues to
destroy villages in the Galilee, which we are interested in [for purposes of settling Jewish
immigrants]." Weitz wrote:
"[The village had been] completely leveled and I now
wonder if it was good that it was destroyed and would it not have been
a greater
revenge had we now settled Jews in the village houses ... [The empty houses
are] good for settlement of [our Jewish] brothers who wandered for generation
upon generation, refugees ... steeped in suffering and sorrow, as they, at
last, find a roof over their heads. This was [the reason for] our war." (Benny
Morris, p. 169)
But what had Palestinians done to deserve Weitz's "revenge"? The Holocaust was
committed by German Nazis, not Palestinian farm families.
Weitz's "solution" only created new multitudes of homeless, wandering refugees.
Should we have compassion for Jewish refugees, but not for Palestinian refugees?
Why? Soon after hostilities ended in 1949, Weitz pleaded with
Ben-Gurion to take a firm and unequivocal stand against any possibility of
restoring Palestinian refugees to their homes. In September, he proposed a
series of measures which would drive the refugees far from the border areas,
deep into Arab hinterlands. He insisted that Palestinian refugees:
"... must be harassed continually." (1949, The First
Israelis, p. 29-30)
In mid-1949 the Transfer Committee recommended that if Israel was to repatriate Palestinian refugees,
she must categorically refuse to return them to their villages—only to towns
where they should not exceed 15% of the Jewish population. (1949, The First
Israelis, p. 29-30)
In 1949 Weitz described his racist dismay at the increasing
numbers of Oriental Jews:
"You know that we do not have a common language with
them. Our culture level is not theirs. Their way of life is medieval ...
While I was talking to Yosef Shprintsak, he expressed anxiety about preserving
our cultural standards given the massive immigration from the Orient. There are
indeed grounds for anxiety, but what's the use? Can we stop it?" Yaakov
Zrubavel, head of the Middle East Department of the Jewish Agency, concurred. "
Perhaps these are not the Jews we would like to see coming here [Jewish state],
but we can hardly tell them not to come..." (1949, The First Israelis, p.
156)
Zionism had degenerated into anti-Semitism not only aimed at Arabs, but also at Jews with the "wrong"
bloodlines, geographic origins and religious beliefs.
Weitz was jubilant that Palestinians are no longer a
majority in "Eretz Yisrael":
"[During the British Mandate period, the JNF had
purchased land] crumb by crumb. But now a great change has taken place before
our eyes. The spirit of Israel, in a giant thrust, has burst through the
obstacles, and has conquered the keys to the land, and the road to fulfillment
has been freed from its bonds and its guardians-enemies [the
Palestinians, most of whom were farmers and their wives and children]. Now, only now, the hour has come for planning considered
[regional] plans ... The abandoned lands will never return to their absentee
owners." (Benny Morris, p. 179)
By war's end in 1949, Weitz feared that the
"infiltrating" (returning) Palestinian
refugees were coming back to their homes. He wrote Moshe Sharett that this
"problem" was causing him "great anxiety":
"Every day our men encounter familiar faces, people who
had been absent, and now they are walking about freely, step by step, returning
to their villages. I fear that while you are discussing the issue in Laussanne
and in other places, the problem is (unfortunately) solving itself—the
refugees are coming back! And our government has taken no action to stop
infiltration. There seems to be no authority, either military or civilian. We've
loosened the rope, and the Arab, with his sly cunning, senses it and knows how
to take advantage of it." (1949, The First Israelis, p. 31)
Weitz was among a few Zionists (along with Moshe Sharett and Aharon
Cizling) who warned that the "Palestinian refugee problem" would not solve itself
in due course of time, contrary to the opinions of other Zionists like Ben-Gurion,
Begin, and Golda Meir:
"The ring of embittered [Palestinian] Arabs surrounding
us with hatred and vengeance on all sides will not be loosened for many years to
come, and we will act as a barrier to a genuine peace between us and our
neighbors." (1949, The First Israelis, p. 31)
In the latter part of 1949, Weitz
proposed helping Christian Palestinian Arabs emigrate
to South America. He wanted to purchase lands for them in the province of
Mendoza. He went to Argentina to study the feasibility of the project
first hand, however, he later noted that nothing came of his proposal since
the Israeli government was unable to make up its mind. (1949, The First
Israelis, p. 63-64)
When it was possible Yosef Weitz often preferred
purchasing Palestinian Arab lands rather than expropriating it. Ben-Gurion thought that such policy was a waste of money
and eventually would drive up the price of the land. Weitz continued to
purchase land even after war's end, among other reasons, because he feared that
the Jewish National Fund and its entire staff would become superfluous and be
closed down. He noted bitterly in his diary:
"Ben-Gurion's way of thinking is that the [Jewish] state
is above everything, and that the Zionist Federation is only there to serve it,
and should exist only as long as it is needed." (1949, The First Israelis, p.
85-86)
When the first Israeli Knesset convened in 1949, two
elected Palestinian Arab-Israelis were present wearing their
tradition headdresses. Weitz wrote in his diary:
"It chilled the heart and angered the soul ... I do not want there to be many of them. Perhaps
they will integrate into society. But it will take several generations before
they become loyal to the [Jewish] state." (1949, The First Israelis, p. 43)
David Ben-Gurion
David Ben-Gurion [1886-1973] was Israel's George Washington. After leading
Israel to victory in the 1948 war, he was elected the first Prime Minister of
Israel on February 14, 1949.
On July 12, 1937, Ben-Gurion made a diary entry about the benefits of the
compulsory population transfer:
"The compulsory transfer of the [Palestinian] Arabs from
the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never
had, even when we stood on our own during the days of the first and second
Temples ... We are given an opportunity which we never dared to dream of in our
wildest imaginings. This is more than a state, government and
sovereignty—this is national consolidation in a free homeland." (Righteous
Victims, p. 142)
On August 7, 1937 he told the
Zionist Assembly during their debate of the Peel Commission:
"... In many parts of the country new settlement will
not be possible without transferring the Arab fellahin ... it is
important that this plan comes from the [British Peel] Commission and not from
us ... Jewish power, which grows steadily, will also increase our
possibilities to carry out the transfer on a large scale. You must remember,
that this system embodies an important humane and Zionist idea, to transfer
parts of a people to their country and to settle empty lands. We believe that
this action will also bring us closer to an agreement with the Arabs."
(Righteous Victims, p. 143)
Ben-Gurion explained the
"transfer solution" in a joint meeting between the Jewish Agency and
Zionist Action Committee on June 12th, 1938:
"With compulsory transfer we [would] have a vast area
[for settlement] ... I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything
immoral in it." (Righteous Victims p. 144)
In a 1938 speech he said:
"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ...
politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves ... The country is
theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down,
and in their view we want to take their country away from them." (Noam Chomsky's
Fateful Triangle pp 91-2 and Simha Flapan's Zionism and the Palestinians,
pp 141-2)
He put the goals of Zionism above the lives of children:
"If I knew that it was possible to save all the children
of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them
to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only
the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of
Israel." (Quoted on pp 855-56 of Shabtai
Teveth's Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation.
Also quoted by Martin Gilbert in "Israel was
everything" in The New York Times, June 21, 1987.)
Ben Gurion called American Jews "human dust," as if they were worthless unless
they lived in Israel.—cf. Israel:
Utopia incorporated, Uri Davis, Zed Press, London, 1977, p. 19. According
to that "logic," the victims of the Holocaust were also "human dust."
This heartless mindset has been confirmed by multiple Jewish sources:
"The last thing on earth that interested the Zionist leaders was humanitarian
work, saving victims and refugees."—Moshe Menuhin, The Decadence of Judaism in our Time, Exposition Press, New
York, 1965.
"The Zionists' ... main preoccupation is not to save Jews alive out of Europe but
to get Jews into Palestine."—Richard Crossman, Washington Diary for 1946.
"In my opinion, the Israeli occupation regime in the conquered territories is
not only not a liberal one; it is in fact one of the most cruel and repressive
regimes in modern time."—Dr. Israel Shahak, Middle East International Supplement, May 1975.
"Torture of Arab prisoners is so widespread and systematic that it cannot be
dismissed as 'rogue cops' exceeding orders. It appears to be sanctioned as
deliberate policy." —The Sunday Times, June 19, 1977.
"With my own eyes I have seen marks of torture on the faces and bodies of
suspects and accused persons. I say it here and now, and challenge anyone to
contradict it."
—Felicia Langer (Israeli lawyer) in a public address at the Conway Hall, London
on 15 May 1974.
Ben-Gurion had no intention of settling for the borders established by the UN partition
plan, telling his General Staff in May 1948:
"We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash
Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is
Lebanon, for the Moslem
regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We
shall establish a
Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab
Legion, eliminate
Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and
move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai." (Quoted in Ben-Gurion, A Biography
by Michael Ben-Zohar)
"The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan: one does
not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the
boundaries fixed today, but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the
concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them."
(Ben-Gurion in a 1937 speech, accepting a British proposal for partition of Palestine
which created a potential Jewish majority state, as quoted in New Outlook, April
1977.)
"Take the American Declaration of Independence for instance. It contains no
mention of the territorial limits. We are not obliged to state the limits of our
State."
—Ben Gurion's diary, May 14, 1948, as quoted by Michael Bar Zohar in The Armed
Prophet, p.133.
"If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural:
we have taken their country." (Ben-Gurion, as quoted in The Jewish Paradox : A personal
memoir by Nahum Goldmann, translated by Steve Cox, p. 99. ISBN
0-448-15166-9.)
"The assets of the Jewish National Home must be created exclusively through our
own work, for only the product of the Hebrew labor can serve as the national
estate." (As quoted in Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs: From Peace to War by Shabtai Teveth, p. 66.)
David Ben-Gurion wrote this in his diary on July 18, 1948:
"We must do everything to insure they [the Palestinians] never do return." (Quoted in Michael
Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet,
Prentice-Hall, p. 157)
Fifty years later, in 1998, Ariel Sharon made the same
point:
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public
opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten
with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonization or
Jewish state without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their
lands." (Ibid.)
But of course he considered it immoral for Nazis to "transfer" Jews from their
homes to concentration camps.
In a speech addressing the Central Committee of the Histadrut on December 30,
1947 Ben-Gurion said:
"In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not
more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with
the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of
its establishment, will be about one million, including almost 40% non-Jews.
such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish
State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness.
With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty
that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority .... There can be
no stable and strong Jewish state so long as it has a Jewish majority of only
60%." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 176 & Benny Morris p. 28)
On February 8th, 1948 he said to the Mapai Council:
"From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema
[East Jerusalem Palestinian neighborhood] ... there are no [Palestinian] Arabs.
One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has
not been as Jewish as it is now. In many Arab neighborhoods in the
west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will
change ... What had happened in Jerusalem ... is likely to happen in many
parts of the country ... in the six, eight, or ten months of the campaign
there
will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the
country." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 180-181)
He also said:
"We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during
the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and
Jerusalem area ... I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change
in the distribution of Arab population." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 181)
The concept of "transferring" European Jews to Palestine
and "transferring" the Palestinian people out is central to Zionism. Ben-Gurion
made this clear in 1944:
"Zionism is a TRANSFER of the Jews. Regarding the
TRANSFER of the Arabs this is much easier than any other
TRANSFER.
There are Arab states in the vicinity ... and it is clear that if the
[Palestinian] Arabs are removed [to these states] this will improve their
condition and not the contrary." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 159)
But of course he was either a fool or a liar. Anyone who has seen pictures of
Palestinian refugee camps knows the terrible truth. Once multitudes of people
have been made homeless and destitute, other people do not have the resources to
take them all in.
In 1938, Ben-Gurion wrote:
"With compulsory transfer we [would] have vast areas
... I support compulsory [population] transfer. I do not see anything immoral
in it. But compulsory transfer could only be carried out by England ... Had its
implementation been dependent merely on our proposal I would have proposed; but
this would be dangerous to propose when the British government has disassociated
itself from compulsory transfer ... But this question should not be removed
from the agenda because it is central question. There are two issues here : 1)
sovereignty and 2) the removal of a certain number of Arabs, and we must insist
on both of them." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, 117)
On July 30, 1937 Yosef Bankover, a founding member and
leader of Kibbutz Hameuhad movement and a member of Haganah's regional command
of the coastal and central districts, stated that Ben-Gurion would accept the
proposed Peel Commission partition plan under two conditions: (1) unlimited
Jewish immigration, and (2) compulsory population transfer for Palestinians:
"Ben-Gurion said yesterday that he was prepared to
accept the [Peel partition] proposal of the Royal commission but on two
conditions: [Jewish] sovereignty and compulsory transfer ... As for the
compulsory transfer—as a member of Kibbutz Ramat Hakovsh [founded in 1932 in
central Palestine] I would be very pleased if it would be possible to be rid of
the pleasant neighborliness of the people of Miski, Tirah, and Qalqilyah."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 70)
Ben-Gurion became obsessed with "transferring" the
Palestinian Arabs out of Palestine, and he started to contemplate the mechanics
and potential problems that could arise if "transfer" to be implemented.
Ben-Gurion contemplated the "Arab Question" in "Eretz Yisrael" and wrote:
"We have to examine, first, if this transfer is
practical, and secondly, if it is necessary. It is impossible to imagine general
evacuation without compulsion, and brutal compulsion. There are of course
sections of the non-Jewish population of the Land of Israel which will not
resist transfer under adequate conditions to certain neighboring countries, such
as the Druze, a number of Bedouin tribes in the Jordan Valley and the south, the Circassians and perhaps even the Metwalis [the Sh'ite of the Galilee]. But it
would be very difficult to bring about resettlement of other sections of the
Arab populations such as the fellahin and the urban populations in
neighboring Arab countries by transferring them voluntarily, whatever economic
inducements are offered to them." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 129)
He also said:
"The possibility of large-scale transfer of a population
by force was demonstrated, when the Greeks and the Turks were transferred [after
WW I]. In the present war [WW II] the idea of transferring a
population is gaining more sympathy as a practical and the most secure means of
solving the dangerous and painful problem of national minorities. The war has
already brought the resettlement of many people in eastern and southern Europe, and
in the plans for the postwar settlements the idea of a large-scale population
transfer in central, eastern, and southern Europe increasingly occupies a
respectable place." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 129)
On December 19, 1947, Ben-Gurion advised the Haganah on
the rules of engagement with the Palestinian population. He stated:
"we adopt the system of aggressive defense; with every
Arab attack we must respond with a decisive blow: the destruction of the place
or the expulsion of the residents along with the
seizure of the place."
(Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 176-177 and Israel: A History, p. 156)
Ben-Gurion was happy and sad when the U.N. voted to
Partition Palestine into two states, Palestinian and Jewish. He was happy
because "finally" Jews could have a "country" of their own. On the other hand,
he was sad because they have "lost" almost half of Palestine, and because they
would have to contend with a sizable Palestinian minority, well over 45% of the
total population. In the following few quotes, you will see how he also stated
that a "Jewish state" cannot survive being 60% Jewish; implying that something
aught to be done to remedy the so called "Arab demographic problem". He stated
on November 30, 1947:
"In my heart, there was joy mixed with sadness: joy that
the nations at last acknowledged that we are a nation with a state, and sadness
that we lost half of the country, Judea and Samaria, and, in addition, that we
[would] have [in our state] 400,000 Arabs." (Righteous Victims, p.
190)
The Sefer Toldot Ha-Haganah, the official
history of the Haganah, clearly stated how Palestinian villages and population
should be dealt with:
"[Palestinian] villages inside the Jewish state
that resist should be destroyed ... and their inhabitants expelled beyond the
borders of the Jewish state ... Palestinian residents of the urban
quarters which dominate access to or egress from towns should be expelled beyond
the borders of the Jewish state in the event of their resistance." (Expulsion
Of The Palestinians, p. 178)
Ben-Gurion clearly didn't intend to honor the borders established by the U.N.
partition plan:
"Before the founding of the state, on the eve of its
creation, our main interests was self-defense. To a large extent, the creation
of the state was an act of self-defense ... Many think that we're still at
the same stage. But now the issue at hand is conquest, not self-defense. As for
setting the borders—it's an open-ended matter. In the Bible as well as in our
history, there all kinds of definitions of the country's borders, so there's no
real limit. No border is absolute. If it's a desert—it could just as well be
the other side. If it's sea, it could also be across the sea. The world has
always been this way. Only the terms have changed. If they should find a way of
reaching other stars, well then, perhaps the whole earth will no longer
suffice." (1949, The First Israelis, p. 6)
But of course most modern, civilized nations do accept permanent borders.
During a visit to Haifa, Ben-Gurion was told that
Abba Khoushi, a labor leader and an official in the Haifa's City Hall, was
trying to persuade Palestinians city to stay. Ben-Gurion reportedly said:
"Doesn't he have anything more important to do?" (Benny
Morris, p. 328)
On June 16, 1948, there were calls by members of the
MAPAM party for the return of Jaffa's "peace minded" Palestinian refugees, and
in response, Ben-Gurion stated during a Cabinet meeting:
"I do not accept the version [i.e. policy] that [we]
should encourage their return ... I believe we should prevent their return ... We must settle Jaffa, Jaffa will become a Jewish city
... If the
Arabs were allowed to return to Jaffa and elsewhere and the war is renewed,
our chances of ending the war as we wish to end it will be reduced ...
Meanwhile, we must prevent at all costs their return ... I will be for them not returning after the
war." (1949, The First Israelis, p. 75)
Moshe Sharett agreed with Ben-Gurion and stated during the same Cabinet
meeting:
"... they will not return. [That] is
out policy. They are not returning." (Benny Morris, p. 141)
When Ezra Danin, a Cabinet member, proposed installing a
puppet Palestinian Government in the Triangle area (northwest of the occupied
West Bank), Ben-Gurion impatiently declared on October 21, 1948 that
Palestinians in Israel were good for only one thing:
"The Arabs of the land of Israel have
only one function left to them—to run away." (Benny Morris, p. 218)
On September 26, 1948, he proposed that Israel should attack the West Bank. According to his diary, Israeli forces would take:
"Bethlehem, and Hebron, where there are about a hundred
thousand [Palestinian] Arabs. I assume that most of the Arabs of Jerusalem,
Bethlehem, and Hebron would flee, like the [Palestinian] Arabs of Lydda, Jaffa,
Tiberias, and Safad, and we will control the whole breadth of the country up to
the Jordan."
In another diary entry he wrote:
"It is not impossible ... that we
will be able to conquer the way to the Negev, Eilat, and the Dead Sea, and to
secure the Negev for ourselves; also to broaden the corridor to Jerusalem, from
north to south; to liberate the rest of Jerusalem and to take the Old City; to
seize all of central and western Galilee and to expand the borders of the state
in all directions." (1949, The First
Israelis, p. 14)
But when Chaim Laskov proposed the occupation of
most of the West Bank in July 1958, Ben-Gurion objected because in his opinion
Palestinians would no longer run away. He
wrote in his diary:
"This time the Arabs on the West Bank will
not run away!" (Iron Wall, p. 200)
During a meeting for the Mapai party center on July 24,
1948, Ben-Gurion clearly stated his thoughts and attitude towards the
Palestinian Arabs, especially in the light of their behavior and flight during
the war. He said:
"Meanwhile, [a return of Palestinian refugees] is out of
the question until we sit together beside a [peace conference] table ... and
they will respect us to the degree that we respect them and I doubt whether they
deserve respect as we do. Because, nevertheless, we did not flee
en mass, [And]
so far no Arab Einstein has risen and [they] have not created what we have built
in this country and [they] have not fought as we are fighting ... we are
dealing here with a collective murderer." (Benny Morris, p. 331)
So in Ben-Gurion's opinion, the absence of an Arab
Einstein, the fleeing of Palestinian Arabs during war, and not fighting are good
reasons for not respecting Palestinians' rights! That was, of course, the way
Hitler and the Nazis thought.
Moshe Dayan in his address to the Technion in Haifa, reported in
Haaretz on April 4, 1969:
"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon
repeated his question, ‘What is to be done with the Palestinian population?’
Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" (Quoted in
The Jewish Paradox by Nahum
Goldmann, p. 99)
"To maintain the status quo will not do. We have to set up a dynamic state
bent
upon expansion."—David Ben Gurion, Rebirth and Destiny of Israel, The Philosophical Press, New
York, 1954, p. 419.
Moshe Sharett
Moshe Sharett [1894-1965] was the director of the Jewish Agency's Political
Department and the first Israeli foreign minister.
He wrote
in 1914:
We have forgotten that we have not come to an empty land
to inherit it, but we have come to conquer a country from people inhabiting it,
that governs it by the virtue of its language and savage culture ... Recently
there has been appearing in our newspapers the clarification about "the mutual
misunderstanding" between us and the Arabs, about "common interests" [and] about
"the possibility of unity and peace between two fraternal peoples." ... [But]
we must not allow ourselves to be deluded by such illusive hopes ... for if we
cease to look upon our land, the Land of Israel, as ours alone and we allow a
partner into our estate, all content and meaning will be lost to our enterprise.
(Righteous Victims, p. 91)
In other words, overtures of peace on the part of Arabs were to be rejected,
because the Zionists didn't want peace or partners: they wanted the whole
enchilada for themselves.
Sharett declared in 1947:
"Transfer could be the crowning achievement, the final
stage in the development of [our] policy, but certainly not the point of
departure. By [speaking publicly and prematurely] we could mobilizing vast
forces against the matter and cause it to fail, in advance." (Righteous Victims,
p. 254)
He added:
"[W]hen the Jewish state is established—it is very
possible that the result will be transfer of [the Palestinian] Arabs."
(Righteous Victims, p. 254)
In August 18 1948, Sharett wrote to Chaim
Weizmann, explaining the Israeli government's determination to block the
return of Palestinian Arab refugees:
"With regard to the refugees, we are determined to be
adamant while the war lasts. Once the return tide starts, it will be impossible
to stem it, and it will prove our undoing. As for the future, we are equally
determined to explore all possibilities of getting rid, once and for all, of the
huge Arab minority [referring to the Palestinian Israeli citizens
of Israel] which originally threatened us. What can be achieved in this period
of storm and stress [referring to the 1948 war] will be quite unattainable once
conditions get stabilized. A group of people [headed by Yosef Weitz] has already
started working on the study of resettlement possibilities [for the Palestinian
refugees] in other lands ... What such permanent resettlement of 'Israeli'
Arabs in the neighboring territories will mean in terms of making land available
in Israel for settlement of our own people requires no emphasis." (Benny Morris,
p. 149-150)
During the armistice negotiation with Jordan, Israel
pressured King Abdullah to concede sovereignty over Wadi 'Ara and Sharett assumed that the Palestinian Arabs
inhabiting the land would be expelled, saying:
"The
interests of security demand that we get rid of them." (1949, The First
Israelis, p. 28)
In response to an announcement made by the Jewish Agency
in mid-1949 that Israel would be willing to take back Palestinian refugees, and
even to compensate them when the war ended, Sharett instructed his Director
General not to repeat such an announcement, and in that regard:
"We must not be understood to say that once the war is
over they [Palestinian refugees] can return ... We'll keep every
option open."
Then days later Sharett wrote Dr. Nahum Goldmann, exulting in:
"... the most spectacular event in the contemporary history
of Palestine ... The opportunities opened up by the present reality for a
lasting and radical solution of the most vexing problem of the Jewish state, are so far-reaching, as to take one's
breath away. The reversion of the status quo ante is unthinkable." (1949, The
First Israelis, p. 29)
Menachem Ussishkin
Menachem Ussishkin [1863-1941] was the Hebrew Secretary of the First Zionist
Congress and later was the President of the Jewish National Fund for 18 years.
He played a big role in Jewish acquisition of land in Palestine before the Nakba
of 1948.
In 1904, before Zionism matured into a powerful
political force, Menachem Ussishkin stated that:
"[Land is acquired] by force—that is, by CONQUEST in
war, or in other words, by ROBBING land from its owner; ... by expropriation
via government authority; or by purchase... [The Zionist movement is limited
to the third choice] until at some point we become rulers." (Righteous Victims,
p. 38)
In April 28, 1930 Ussishkin stated in an
address to journalists in Jerusalem:
"We must continually raise the demand that our land be
returned to our possession ... If there are other inhabitants there, they must
be transferred to some other place. We must take over the land. We have a
GREATER
and NOBLER ideal than preserving several hundred thousands of [Palestinian]
Arabs fellahin [peasants]." (Righteous Victims, p. 141)
It's hard to see what is so "great" and "noble" about manhandling innocent women
and children, and stealing land from farmers.
On May 19, 1936 Ussishkin declared:
"What we can demand today is that all Transjordan be
included in the Land of Israel ... on condition that Transjordan would be
either be made available for Jewish colonization or for the resettlement of
those [Palestinian] Arabs, whose lands [in Palestine] we would purchase. Against
this, the most conscientious person could not argue ... For the [Palestinian]
Arabs of the Galilee, Transjordan is a province ... this will be for the
resettlement of Palestine's Arabs. This the land problem ... Now the
[Palestinian] Arabs DO NOT WANT us because we want to be the rulers. I will
fight for this. I will make sure that we will be the landlords of this land ... because this country belongs to us not to them
... " (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 51)
In 1937 Ussishkin wrote about the proposed
ethnic cleansing:
"We cannot start the Jewish state with ... half the
population being Arab ... Such a state cannot survive even half an hour. And
about transferring sixty thousand Arab families he said: "It is most moral ...
I am ready to come an defend ... it before the Almighty." (Righteous Victims, p.
143-144 and Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 37)
In 1938 Ussishkin commented on the partition
plan proposed by the British Peel Commission:
"We cannot begin the Jewish state with population of
which the Arab living on their lands constitute almost half and the Jews exists
on the land in very small numbers and they are all crowded in Tel Aviv and its
vicinity ... and the WORST is not only the Arabs here constitute
50 percent or 45 percent but 75 percent of the land is in the hands of the
Arabs. Such a state cannot survive even for half an hour ... The
question is not whether they will be majority or a minority in Parliament. You
know that even a small minority could disrupt the whole order of parliamentary
life ... therefore I would say to the [Peel] Commission and the government that
we would not accept reduced Land of Israel without you giving us the land, on
the one hand, and removing the largest number of
Arabs, particularly the peasants, on the other before we come forward to take the
reins of government in our lands even provisionally." (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 111-112 and Righteous Victims, p. 143-144)
Moshe Dayan
Moshe Dayan [1915-1981] was an Israeli military leader who rose to Chief of
Staff, who later became Defense Minister and Foreign Minister of Israel. Dayan belonged to a new generation of tough
home-grown military commanders. He was born in 1915 to Shmuel Dayan (a member of the
first Knesset) in Degania near the Sea of Galilee. In 1935, he joined the
Haganah while still in his teens, and in 1941 he lost an eye in an Allied operation against
the forces of the French Vichy Government in Lebanon. During the 1948 war, his
battalion captured Ramla and Lydda, and he later became the governor of
Jerusalem. He was a war hero who eventually became Israel's Defense Minister. He
also was a farmer, a secret poet, an amateur archaeologist, a politician, and a
statesman who served as Foreign Minister under Menachem Begin.
Dayan wrote in his memories regarding the ethnic cleansing and destruction of
Palestinian villages:
"[houses were destroyed] not in battle, but as
punishment ... and in order to CHASE AWAY the inhabitants ... contrary to
government policy." (Righteous Victims, p. 328)
In September 1967 Dayan told senior staff in the
Israeli Occupation Army in the West Bank that some 200,000 Palestinian Arabs had
left the West Bank and Gaza Strip:
"we must understand the motives and causes of the
continued emigration of the Arabs, from both the Gaza Strip and
the West Bank, and not undermine these cause after all; we want to create a
new map." (Righteous Victims, p. 338)
On 30 July 1973 Dayan said to Time Magazine:
"There is no more Palestine. Finished ..." (Iron Wall,
p. 316)
Dayan questioned the dubious "morality" of Israel's "anti-infiltration" policy:
"Using the moral yardstick mentioned by [Moshe Sharett], I must ask: Are [we
justified] in opening fire on the Arabs who cross [the border] to
reap the crops they planted in our territory; they, their women, and their
children? Will this stand up to moral scrutiny ...? We shoot at those from among
the 200,000 hungry Arabs who cross the line [to graze their
flocks]—will this stand up to moral review? Arabs cross to
collect the grain that they left in the 'abandoned' [the term often used by Israelis
to describe the ethnically cleansed] villages and we set mines for them and they
go back without an arm or a leg ... [It may be that this] cannot pass review,
but I know no other method of guarding the borders." (Righteous Victims, p. 275)
In the mid-1950s, Dayan was anxious to initiate a
"preventive" war against Egypt to neutralize the modernization of its army,
according to Moshe Sharett's diary:
"Moshe Dayan unfolded one plan after another for direct
action. The first—what should be done to force open the blockade of the Gulf of
Eilat. A ship flying the Israeli flag should be sent, and if the Egyptians bomb
it, we should bomb the Egyptian base from the air, or conquer Ras al-Naqb, or
open our way south of Gaza Strip to the coast. There was a general uproar. I
asked Moshe: Do you realize that this would mean war with Egypt?, he said: Of
course." (Iron Wall, p. 105)
Dayan wrote in the 1955 regarding the collective
punishments imposed on Palestinian civilian population by the Israeli Army:
"The only method that proved effective, not justified or
moral but effective, when Arabs plant mines on our side [in retaliation]. If we
try to search for the [particular] Arab [who planted mines], it has not value.
But if we HARASS the nearby village ... then the population there comes out
against the [infiltrators] ... and the Egyptian Government and the Transjordan
Government are [driven] to prevent such incidents because their prestige is
[assailed], as the Jews have opened fire, and they are unready to begin a war
... the method of collective punishment so far has proved effective." (Righteous
Victims, p. 275-276)
And in the 1950s he also stated on the same subject :
"We could not guard every water pipeline from being
blown up and every tree from being uprooted. We could not prevent every murder
of a worker in an orchard or a family in their beds. But it was in our power to
set high price for our blood, a price too high for the Arab
community, the Arab army, or the Arab governments to think it worth paying ... It was in our power to cause the Arab governments to renounce 'the policy of
strength' toward Israel by turning it into a demonstration of weakness." (Iron
Wall, p. 103)
The "too high" price Dayan mentions is collective
punishment such as house demolition, uprooting trees, etc.
Dayan stated in an oration at the funeral of an
Israeli farmer killed by a Palestinian Arab in April 1956:
"... Let us not today fling accusation at the
murderers. What cause have we to complain about their fierce hatred to us? For
eight years now, they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes
we turn into our homestead the land and villages in which they and their
forefathers have lived.
We should demand his blood not from the
Arabs of Gaza but from ourselves ... Let us make our reckoning today. We are
a generation of settlers, and without the steel helmet and gun barrel, we shall
not be able to plant a tree or build a house ... Let us not be afraid to see
the hatred that accompanies and consumes the lives of hundreds of thousands of
Arabs who sit all around us and wait for the moment when their
hands will be able to reach our blood." (Iron Wall, p. 101)
Dayan saw no need for American guarantees of
Israel's security and strongly opposed America's conditions that Israel
forswear territorial expansion and military retaliation. In an informal talk
with the ambassadors to Washington, London, and Paris, Dayan describe military
retaliations as a "life drug" to the Israel Army. First, it obliged the Arab
governments to take drastic measures to protect their borders. Second, it enabled the Israeli government to maintain a high degree of
tension in the country and the army. Gideon Rafael, also present at the meeting
with Dayan, remarked to Moshe Sharett:
"This is how fascism began in Italy and Germany!" (Iron
Wall, p. 133-134)
While planning the attack on Egypt in 1956, Ben-Gurion
and Moshe Dayan were trying to work out a plan to internally destabilize Lebanon
in favor of Christian-Maronite government, and Dayan proposed:
"All that is required is to find an officer, even a
captain [later to be Sa'ed Haddad] would do, to win his heart or buy him with
money to get him to agreed to declare himself the savior of the Maronite
population. Then the Israeli army will enter Lebanon, occupy the necessary
territory, and create a Christian regime that will ally itself with Israel. The
territory from Litani southward will be totally annexed to Israel, and
everything will fall into place." (Iron Wall, p. 133-134)
This plan was implemented
25 years later during the Israeli invasions of Lebanon in 1978 and 1982. More than 20,000 civilians were killed, and
yet Israel had to withdraw with its tail between its legs in May 2000.
In November 1967, he was also quoted as saying:
"We want [Palestinian] emigration, we want a normal
standard of living, we want to encourage emigration according to a selective
program." (Righteous Victims, p. 338)
At a July 14, 1968 meeting in his office, he
said:
"The proposed policy [of raising the level of public
service in the occupied territories] may clash with our intention to encourage
emigration from both [Gaza] Strip and Judea and Samaria. Anyone who has
practical ideas or proposal to encourage emigration—let him speak up. No idea
or proposal is to be dismissed out of hand." (Righteous Victims, p. 339)
So twenty years after the Nakba of 1948, it was still Israeli policy of
"encouraging" Palestinians to leave Gaza and the West Bank.
When Dayan addressed the Technion (Israel
Institute of Technology), as quoted in Ha'aretz on April 4, 1969, he
said:
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab
villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not
blame you because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not
exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of
Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of
Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not one
single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population."
In series of interviews conducted in 1976 (later published in Yediot Ahronot after his death in 1981),
Dayan
confessed that his greatest mistake was that, as a Minister of Defense in June
1967, he did not stick to his original opposition to storming the Golan Heights,
and he described how the confrontation with the Syrian evolved to a war:
"Never mind that [when asked if Syrians had initiated the
war from the Golan Heights]. After all, I know how at least 80 percent of the
clashes there started. In my opinion, more than 80 percent, but let's talk about
80 percent. It went this way: We would send a tractor to plough someplace where
it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in
advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would
tell the tractor to advance farther, until in the end Syrians would get annoyed
and shoot. And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and
that's how it was. I did that, and Laskov and Chara [Zvi Tsur, Rabin's
predecessor as chief of staff] did that, Yitzhak did that, but it seems to me
that the person who most enjoyed these games was Dado [David Elzar, OC Northern
Command, 1964-69]." (Iron Wall, p. 236-237)
Moshe Dayan once remarked "describing Israel's
relationship with the United States":
"Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice.
We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice." (Iron Wall, p.
316)
"During the last 100 years our people have been in a process of building up the
country and the nation, of expansion, of getting additional Jews and additional
settlements in order to expand the borders here. Let no Jew say that the process
has ended. Let no Jew say that we are near the end of the road."—Moshe Dayan,
Ma'ariv, July 7, 1968.
Yitzhak Rabin
Yitzhak Rabin, an Israeli Prime Minister, said: "We shall reduce the Arab
population to a community of
woodcutters and waiters" (Uri Lubrani, Ben-Gurion's
special adviser on
Arab Affairs, 1960; from "The Arabs in Israel" by Sabri
Jiryas; also published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979)
"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon
repeated his
question, What is to be done with the Palestinian
population?' Ben-Gurion
waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them
out!'" (Yitzhak Rabin,
leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in
the New York Times,
23 October 1979)
"[Israel will] create in the course of the next 10 or 20
years conditions which would attract natural and voluntary migration of the
refugees from the Gaza Strip and the west Bank to Jordan. To achieve this we
have to come to agreement with King Hussein and not with Yasser Arafat." (Yitzhak Rabin, explaining his method of ethnically cleansing the occupied land
without stirring a world outcry, quoted by David Shipler in the New York Times,
04/04/1983, citing Meir Cohen's remarks to the Knesset's foreign affairs and
defense committee on March 16)
Rabin was the deputy commander of Operation Danny, the largest
Israeli military
operation to that point, which involved four IDF brigades. The cities of Ramle
and Lydda were captured, as well as the major airport in Lydda, as part of the
operation. Following the capture of the two towns there was an exodus of their
Arab population. Rabin signed the expulsion order, which included the following,
"The inhabitants of Lydda must be expelled quickly without attention to age."
Rabin was famous (or infamous) for ordering Israeli troops to “break the bones”
of Palestinian demonstrators (mostly children).
Henry Kissinger stated “I ask Rabin to make concessions, and he says he can’t
because Israel is too weak. So I give him arms, and he says he doesn’t need to
make concessions because Israel is strong” (quoted in Findley’s Deliberate
Deceptions, p.199).
Rabin once said in the Knesset: “For all its faults, Labor has done more and
remains capable of doing more in the future [in expanding Jewish settlements]
than Likud with all of its doing. We have never talked about Jerusalem. We have
just made a fait accompli [accomplished fact]. It was we who built the
suburbs in [the annexed part of] Jerusalem. The Americans didn’t say a word,
because we built these suburbs cleverly.”
Ariel Sharon was the eleventh Prime Minister of Israel.
On October 14-15, 1953, under Sharon's command, Israeli squads
attacked the unarmed Arab village of Qibya in the demilitarized zone, where they
blew up 42 houses and killed more than 60 residents who were trapped inside. The
details were so gruesome that the U.S. joined in a U.N. condemnation of the
Israeli action, and for the first and only time, suspended aid to Israel in
reprisal.
In September 1982, the massacre of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps was
committed. More than 2,500 Palestinian women, children and elderly people were
slaughtered in cold blood. The Israeli high court held a number of
Israeli military officers, including Sharon, responsible.
Menachem Begin
Menachem Begin (1913-1992) was born in in Brest Litovsk,
currently Belarus, and graduated as a lawyer from the University of Warsaw,
Poland. After the Germans occupied Poland, he sought refuge in Lithuania. In
1942, he emigrated to Palestine where he led the Irgun terror gang. Since he
opposed
British policies, Begin waged a war of terror
against both the British and Palestinians. Begin was wanted by the British for
acts of terrorism and war crimes.
The Irgun and Begin were credited with the most famous
massacre against Palestinian civilians, during the 1948 war, at DEIR YASSIN.
From 1948 to 1977, Begin led the Israeli
opposition as a member of the Likud party, and in 1977 he became Israel's sixth
Prime Minister. He is credited with achieving the first peace treaty and
neutralizing Egypt's army. With Egypt sidelined, Begin began
attacking the PLO and destroying its bases in Lebanon. He resigned office in 1983 soon after the death of his wife, and then
lived in seclusion until his death in 1992.
Begin was a disciple of Ze'ev Jabotinsky and a strong believer in the IRON WALL theory. The loss of
both his parents during the Holocaust had a profound affect on his politics. Nazi war crimes against Jews were often cited by Begin as
excuses for his heavy-handed policies against Arabs.
One day after the U.N. vote to partition Palestine, Begin imperiously proclaimed:
"The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be
recognized ... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel
will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever." (Iron Wall,
p. 25)
Soon after Begin was elected Prime Minister in 1977, the government's foreign policy was stated as follows:
"... the Jewish people have the unchallengeable, eternal,
historic right to the Land of Israel [including the West Bank and Gaza Strip],
the inheritance of their forefathers" (Iron Wall, p.
354-355)
Begin used the Holocaust as a justification for
the invasion of Lebanon. On June 5, 1982 he told the Israeli Cabinet:
"The hour of decision has arrived. You know what I have
done, and what all of us have done. to prevent war and bereavement. But our fate
is that in the Land of Israel there is no escape from fighting in the spirit of
self-sacrifice. Believe me, the alternative to fighting is Treblinka, and we
have resolved that there would be no Treblinkas. This is the moment in which
courageous choice has to be made. The criminal terrorists and the world must
know that the Jewish people have a right to self-defense, just like any other
people" (Iron Wall, p. 404-405).
Almost 18 years later, the Israeli army was forced out
of Lebanon after murdering more than 20,000 Lebanese and Palestinian civilians.
In the new
Treblinka it was Lebanese and Palestinian civilians who were being murdered, not
Jews.
When American President Ronald Reagan threatened to
review American-Israeli relations over the indiscriminate carpet bombing of
Beirut in 1982, once again Begin used the
Holocaust to excuse his actions:
"Now may I tell you, dear Mr. President, how I feel
these days when I turn to the creator of my soul in deep gratitude. I feel as a
Prime Minister empowered to instruct a valiant army facing Berlin where amongst
innocent civilians, Hitler and his henchmen hide in a bunker deep beneath the
surface. My generation, dear Ron, swore on the alter of God that whoever
proclaims his intent to destroy the Jewish state or the Jewish people, or both,
seals his fate, so that which happened once on instruction from Berlin—with or
without inverted commas—will never happen again" (Iron Wall, p. 404-405).
When President Reagan sent a letter to Begin
condemning the attack on the Iraqi civilian nuclear reactor in June 1981, Begin
responded with a letter replete with references to the Holocaust:
"A million and half children were poisoned by Zyklon
gas during the Holocaust. Now Israel's children were about to be poisoned by
radioactivity. For two years we have lived in the shadow of the danger awaiting
Israel from the nuclear reactor in Iraq. This would have been a new Holocaust. It
was prevented by the heroism of our pilots to whom we owe so much." (Iron Wall,
p. 387)
Menachem Begin was strongly influenced by Ze'ev
Jabotinsky's Iron Wall theory:
"The deterrent power, or in Jabotinsky's language THE
IRON WALL was intended to convince the Arabs that they would not be able to get
rid of the sovereign Jewish presence in the Land of Israeli, even if they would
not bring themselves to recognize the justice of the Jewish people's claim to
the homeland." (Iron Wall, p. 354)
In 1991, Binyamin Begin, the son of Menahem
Begin and a prominent voice in the Likud party, said:
"In strategic terms, the settlements (in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza) are of no
importance." What makes them important, he said, was that "they constitute an
obstacle, an insurmountable obstacle to the establishment of an independent Arab
State west of the river Jordan." (Findley's Deliberate Deceptions,
p. 159)
Israel "will never withdraw from the occupied territories."—Menachem Begin's
speech on West Bank for Israel independence day, New York Times, May,
1981.
Golda Meir
Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir's most infamous quote was: "There is no such thing as a Palestinian."
"How can we return the occupied territories? There is
nobody to return them to."—Golda Meir (March 8, 1969, quoted in Chapter 13 of
The Zionist
Connection II: What Price Peace by Alfred Lilienthal )
"Any one who speaks in favor of bringing the Arab
refugees back must also say how he expects to take the responsibility for it, if
he is interested in the state of Israel. It is better that things are stated
clearly and plainly: We shall not let this happen." (Golda Meir, 1961, in a speech to the Knesset,
reported in Ner, October 1961)
"This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise
made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its
legitimacy." (Golda Meir, Le Monde, 15 October 1971)
My delegation cannot refrain from speaking on this question—we who have such
an intimate knowledge of boxcars and of deportations to unknown destinations
that we cannot be silent. (On Soviet actions in Hungary, to the UN General
Assembly 11/21/1956, but she was certainly silent, or lied through her teeth,
about the deportations of Palestinian farmers and their completely innocent
children.)
Arab sovereignty in Jerusalem just cannot be. This city will not be divided—not
half and half, not 60-40, not 75-25, nothing. (Time, 02-19-1973.)
Demographic Maps
Map 1 of 1946 Palestine shows more than 90% of the land belonging to Palestinians; at this point Jewish settlers had paid for most of
the land they occupied
Map 2 of 1947 U.N. partition plan of Israel and Palestine; the land in the white areas was not "given" to Israel; Israeli Jews
took the additional land
Map 3 of 1967 borders of Israel and Palestine; these are the "1967 lines" aka as the "1949 armistice lines"; once again Israeli Jews
took the additional land
Map 4 of 2000 borders shows how Israel keeps taking land outside its legal borders, creating discontiguous Palestinian
bantustans
The HyperTexts