The HyperTexts
Did Lord Bryon inspire Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein?
Is her book a reflection on the moral issues of procreation?
by Michael R. Burch
I believe the tragic hero of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is its 
rebellious creature, 
just as the tragic hero of John Milton's Paradise Lost is its rebellious 
angel. 
And for the same reason: the unjustness of their creators. Surely no one 
sympathizes with Dr. Frankenstein or Jehovah: all our sympathies are with their 
victims of their "creativity."
Furthermore, I believe Mary Shelley was posing important philosophical questions in her famous 
novel: Do any of us have the right to "play god" by bringing new life into a 
world where we cannot guarantee the happiness of our creations? 
Do human beings have the right to reproduce?
I believe Mary Shelley wrote a probing philosophical book that may have been 
based on, or greatly influenced by, Lord Byron's pessimistic view of his assumed 
Creator, the biblical "god" Yahweh aka Jehovah. From what I have read on the subject, 
her husband Percy 
Bysshe Shelley, an atheist, had to "talk down" Byron at times from black moods 
induced by his dark religion, Christianity, with its diabolical "god" who creates 
human beings with needs and desires, damns them for acting on the needs and 
desires he instilled in them, then predestines (predetermines) which ones will go to 
heaven and hell before they are born (according to the epistles of the apostle 
Paul and other hard-to-credit Bible verses). 
My discovery of Percy Shelley "talking down" Byron led me to wonder whether Byron's dark view of his Creator may have inspired Mary 
Shelley's overambitious doctor. After all, she and Percy were houseguests of Byron when she came 
up with the story. In fact, it was Byron's idea that he and his houseguest 
should create ghost stories to entertain each other that led to Mary Shelley's 
novel being written. 
But in any case Victor Frankenstein pales in comparison to Jehovah, who condemned 
all his creations to suffer and die, destroyed all but a handful in the Great 
Flood, then serial-murdered children, toddlers, infants, babies and animals in the Plagues of Egypt and 
various other calamities—to 
this day, if modern "prophets" like Pat Robertson are to be believed. 
Anyone who claims Jehovah was "good" has not read what the Bible actually says, 
or has not read it honestly. The biblical god Jehovah was not remotely 
good, praiseworthy or trustworthy. Hell, even the greatest Christian poets have struggled with 
the problem that no one can possibly love or trust Jehovah as he is 
portrayed in the Bible. After all, Jehovah murdered Adam, Eve and everyone we 
ever loved, including our pets! Consequently, the greatest Christian poets had little or 
nothing to do with the dubious trio of biblical "gods" or the "good 
news" of the bloody "atonement." In evidence:
• Dante turned for 
salvation to the woman he loved, Beatrice, and the pagan poet Virgil, not 
Jehovah or Christ. Those are very curious choices for someone who has been 
called the greatest of all Christian poets!
• John Milton intended to "justify the ways of God to man," but 
only managed to make Jehovah seem like a heartless tyrant and Christ like a blitzkrieging Rommel, while turning Adam, Eve and Lucifer into romantic heroes for the ages. 
Milton gave the "atonement" one enjambed line in his massive epic, as if the 
idea might have embarrassed him. Or perhaps he didn't believe in the "atonement" 
himself but thought he couldn't leave it out entirely. Does any educated human 
being want to believe in primitive, bloodthirsty gods, much less admit it in 
public? No wonder Milton rushed through that bit of spin, if he 
considered it impossible or dangerous to leave out. 
• William Blake, probably the English language's 
most spiritual major poet, and arguably England's greatest prophet, called the 
biblical god NOBODADDY because no one would want him for a father. Blake also 
claimed to be his own Christ and denied that he needed anyone to "save" him. 
• Walt Whitman, the father of American poetry who 
created modern free verse by enlisting the cadences of the King James Bible, 
also claimed to be his own Christ. He saw all earthly religions as equals but 
had no need for any of them himself. 
• Emily Dickinson, the mother of American poetry and 
perhaps its most spiritual poet along with Whitman, compared Jehovah to a 
burglar and a banker. Dickinson entered Mount Holyoke Female Seminary in 1847. At the time 
Holyoke classified its students into three categories: "established Christians," 
those who "expressed hope" and those "without hope." Dickinson was a "no hoper." 
In one of her most powerful poems, Dickinson wrote that after groping for 
answers "from Blank to Blank" she shut her eyes and discovered "'Twas lighter—to 
be Blind" (not exactly an endorsement of Jehovah, Christ, the Bible or the 
Christian religion).
Dante, Milton, Blake, Whitman and Dickinson have each been called a "sect of 
one." These are the most major "Christian" poets, and yet no one can find a hint of 
orthodoxy in their poems. Where do they praise Jehovah for creating them? Where 
do they praise Christ for saving them? And Byron had an even darker vision of 
Jehovah. Did Byron see himself as a monster, the victim of an unjust Creator? He 
was born deformed with a club foot—was that his fault, or 
God's? If the rumors are true that Byron committed incest, who created such 
desires in his loins—was the fault his, or God's?
Blake posed similar questions in his companion poems "The Lamb" and "The Tyger": 
What is the nature of a Creator who creates innocent, defenseless lambs, but 
also savage predators who rip lambs to shreds without an ounce of pity? Is 
the tiger responsible for its savage nature? If not, who is? What is the nature 
of such a Creator, what are his intentions toward us, and why should we trust 
him?
While I admit that my theory is speculative, I believe it makes sense:
Mary and Percy Shelley were houseguests of Lord Byron at the time 
Frankenstein was conceived.
Byron had a clubfoot and a "monstrous" reputation that included accusations of 
incest.
Percy Shelley was aware of Byron's dark views of his Creator and sometimes 
"talked him down" during his black moods.
Byron challenged his houseguests to enter into a ghost-story-telling 
competition.
Did Mary Shelley make Byron the model for her story's protagonist, with his 
Creator the model for the villain?
 
In any case,
I take Mary Shelley's book to raise the question: "Does anyone have the right to 
bring new life into such a dark, dangerous world so full of unhappiness?" That question might be asked not 
only of human scientists, but also of prospective parents and the Creator himself, if 
such a being exists. 
The HyperTexts